Barr to release redacted Mueller report 'within a week'

Laverne Higgins
April 14, 2019

"My original timetable of being able to release by mid-April stands", Barr testified to a House Appropriations subcommittee.

Barr repeatedly refused to answer a direct question as to whether the White House has seen - or will see - the full Mueller report prior to its release.

At the House hearing, Barr said he expected to release a redacted version of the Mueller report within a week, with plans to color-code redactions and provide an explanation for why material was not released publicly.

Attorney General Bill Barr has assembled a "team" to investigate the origins of the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign, an administration official briefed on the situation told Fox News on Tuesday.

But Barr has said he will not release key evidence that is part of any investigation by a grand jury, a special panel used by prosecutors in politically sensitive cases.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report about that could be done in May or June, Barr said.

On Wednesday he said, "It was started illegally". "I also think under appropriate safeguards, there is a way of people verifying these categories (of redactions) were not abused".

Indian Oil halts fuel supply to Jet Airways over non-payment of dues
The extension of deadline was due to some changes and clarifications they issued in the bid document on April 8. The lenders have offered a stake from 31.2 to 75 per cent of the company on a fully diluted basis.


"I don't intend at this stage to send the full unredacted report to the committee", Barr told a House of Representatives Appropriations subcommittee.

Explaining the rapid turnaround for his letter, Barr said, "The thinking of the special counsel was not a mystery to the Department of Justice prior to the submission of the report".

Attorney General William Barr has assembled a team to review controversial counterintelligence decisions made by Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation officials, including actions taken during the probe of the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016, according to a person familiar with the matter. "The question is whether it was predicated, adequately predicated", meaning whether it was legally justified.

"I believe that our country must respond to any foreign interference with the strongest measures, and we must work with partners at the state level to ensure that our election infrastructure is completely protected", his statement says.

Asked again about spying at the end of the hearing, Barr tempered his tone. "There were dirty cops", he said. "I am saying I am concerned about it, and I am looking into it", he said.

The FBI's ultimately successful warrant application to surveil Page, which relied in part on information from British ex-spy Christopher Steele - whose anti-Trump views are now well-documented - cited Page's suspected Russian Federation ties. While Barr's letter said the special counsel did not find a criminal conspiracy between Russian Federation and Trump associates during the 2016 election, it also said Mueller had presented evidence on both sides of the obstruction question and ultimately did not reach a conclusion on it. They also want all of the underlying documents from the investigation.

Other Democrats made similar comments on Barr's decisions related to the review of Mueller's probe, which, according to Barr, found no evidence of collusion and did not make a determination on obstruction of justice.

Other reports by

Discuss This Article

FOLLOW OUR NEWSPAPER